Why a newspaper costs less than a cup of tea ?

November 3rd, 2010 | Vinod Kad

Is it not surprising if not shocking that in a country like India and perhaps in many other countries the basic, essential and daily consumable eatables like a cup of tea is costlier than a non-essential, far less used thing like a newspaper ?  

In India a cup of tea costs about Rs.5 while a newspaper costs about Rs. 2 to 3 only.  

There seems no economic or any other logic at all in every government’s policy of subsidizing newspaper costs while letting prices of such essential, bare minimum eatables like a cup of tea to go on rising.  

What is more essential to a poor man on the street for his survival ? A cup of tea or a newspaper ?   

While those who read newspapers can very very easily bear the real cost of a newspaper, it is daily becoming difficult for a poor, common man on the street to bear rising costs of essential eatable commodities like a cup of tea or milk, a bread piece, a fruit piece etc..  

Further while there is so much talk about preserving our forests and other environmental assets, in practice daily perhaps millions of tones of paper is consumed in printing newspapers all over the world.  

More surprisingly a newspaper is daily thrown away by everybody in the whole world after not reading it perhaps for more than an hour in a day. What a waste !  Isn’t it ? Where are the so called environmentalists, policy makers etc. who keep talking about preserving our forests etc. ?  

What is the compulsion of governments all around in the world to continue subsidizing the costs of printing newspapers while the owners of these newspapers are earning lots of profits ?  Perhaps the only reason of this so-obvious anomaly is that every government seems very much scared of the media. They perhaps fear that if they remove all subsidies to media houses for printing newspapers, they all will start exposing grave mistakes of the governments.  

In my opinion governments should ensure that the prices of essential, bare minimum eatable commodities like tea, vegetables, fruits, milk etc. must remain within reach of the poorest man on the street and the costs of things like newspapers etc. must not be subsidized at all. 

And in case the newspaper publishers recover their costs from advertisements even then the governments should tax them heavily so that costs of bare minimum things like tea, bread, vegetables, fruits etc. can remain low and affordable by poorest of the poor. 

This is because those who daily buy a newspaper can surely pay more than the cost of a cup of tea if they really want to read it.

Sachin Tendulkar

November 2nd, 2010 | Vinod Kad

Sachin Tendulkar is a man from whom everybody can learn a lot especially those who know him by watching him play.

I like and respect him very much but not because he is a famous cricketer who has made so many runs and lot of money. I like Sachin because of his LOVE for his game. When he plays he plays so attentively and so passionately even after playing the same game for more than 20 years. His consistency, committment to his game is worth investigating and understanding.

As he himself has clarified many times and I also fully agree that the main reason for his tremendous success, consistency and respect all over the cricketing and sports world is his LOVE for his game.

It is just his LOVE for cricket that is keeping him fit, consistent, committed and successful in his game. He just ENJOYS playing cricket as a child who keeps playing for hours together without worrying about his food, health and other things.

I often draw tremendous inspiration from him and wonder that if I and every person on this earth can somehow find his LOVE then we all can become as happy, innocent, ever-green and successful as Sachin is.

Perhaps it is not difficult to find what we LOVE to do, the more difficult part is to remain committed to do what we LOVE to do. It is said that Sachin used to forget and leave behind every other work and comfort in order to play cricket which he LOVED so much.

India Is Not A Secular Country

August 17th, 2008 | Vinod Kad

Notwithstanding what is written in the Constitution of India and other government laws and what is often ‘spoken’ or ‘said’ by its politicians India is not a secular country by any standard because :-

- Here jobs are reserved for people on the basis of their ‘caste’ and ’religion’

- Here everybody is required to mention his/her ‘religion’ in most of the Forms submitted in various departments, offices etc. of the government or even in the private sector

- Here the words Hindu, Muslim etc. are often used to describe an area, an organisation, an educational institution etc. e.g. Aligarh Muslim University, Benaras Hindu University, Indian Muslim League etc. etc.

- Here people do not have a Uniform Civil Code

- Here even Constitution of India uses the words scheduled ‘castes’. It clearly shows it recognises caste system in India. It should have used the words ‘Economically Backward People’

- Here even prominent people often identify themselves as belonging to a particular religion as if they have no other identity e.g. A Sikh Prime Minister, A Muslim President etc. etc.

- Here even the Prime Minister of India – Dr Manmohan Singh talks of giving special incentives or creating special economic measures for minority classes. He even directly uses words like ‘Muslims’ from the Red Fort in his 15 August address. It clearly shows that his Government is so poor in understanding human sentiments. Why he needs to use the word ‘muslims’ ? It shows either he has done some crime against Muslims for which he wants to apologise or he had neglected them very badly in the past. Both are wrong.  As  a Prime Minister he should simple say every ‘deserving’ Indian needs to be given attention whether he is ‘Muslim’ or ‘Hindu’ or anybody.

A secular state is one where there is no need to use any word like Muslim or Hindu etc..

The only basis of helping poor people should be their economic condition and nothing else.

Warren Buffett

August 15th, 2008 | Vinod Kad


I like Warren Buffett very much but not for his being the richest man in the world but because of his humility and deep insight and understanding of  whatever is happening around him especially in the field of finance and investments. Another and perhaps the most important reason is that he loves his work very much.


He has often said in his interviews and written communications that he loves his work not because of the money it earns him but because he likes and loves to do what he is doing. His words are amply supported by the fact that he has not thought of retiring even at the ripe age of 75 + .


His love for his work was also proved when somebody asked him what will he be doing 10 years from now (2008). His answer was he will continue doing same thing he is doing now. In fact he is doing the same thing for last more than 30 years i.e. investments.


These are the reasons people should really admire him because then they can try to taste success in their own fields also instead of trying to become wealthy by doing investment business. He never wants people to copy or imitate him that’s why he never recommends any stock to others.

He has said many times that one should do whatever one loves to do, is passionate to do and then money and success follows as a consequence, as a shadow.

 

What is the job of a Government ?

August 15th, 2008 | Vinod Kad

There are only two basic jobs of any ruler or a Government. The first is ensuring security of its people from outside the country and within the country and the second is ensuring justice to its people from anybody infringing the principle of Live and Let Live. All other jobs like trade, health etc. can be very well taken care by the people at local levels.

If a Government can achieve 100% success in these two basic duties all other jobs will be done by people themselves and people will be much happy and confident about their rulers. But in their lust for more powers and their urge to rule over others, politicians and their Governments have taken up many impossible, un-necessary and in-competitive jobs to do e.g. trading, manufacturing, health care, education, art & culture, tourism etc. etc..

There are more than 45 central ministries and many more departments etc. in the Government of India which are supposed to look after so many different matters. It is simply IMPOSSIBLE for any organization (i.e. a Govt or a political party) to achieve any excellence in so many areas. And surprisingly, especially in India so far no Government has had been able to achieve abovesaid two basic duties i.e. security and justice for its people.

Ever since its Independence on 15 August 1947, India is struggling with both external as well as internal security problems. After 1971 India is struggling more with its internal security due to increasing terrorism and regional insurgencies in many border and other states. An ordinary person in India has no faith or trust that his life is secured from any terrorist attack and he is also not confident that he can get justice from the Judiciary in India. If the Government gets some spare time after doing these two duties then its third duty should be to ensure education for its people.

If any political leader or party is sincerely interested in helping its people, they should first of all ensure 100% efficiency in abovesaid two basic jobs of a Government i.e. security and justice for its people. If they achieve this all other jobs will be done by people at local or state levels.

Independence Day – Are We Really Independent ?

August 13th, 2008 | Vinod Kad


Like every year, Prime Minister of India will again address the people tomorrow (15 August 2008) from Red Fort and will announce achievements made by his government in last four years and will also announce various populist schemes for future.

But sadly nobody has ever taken time to look around and see if we are really independent. If you compare India just before 1947 and India of 2008, I do not see much difference except the names of the rulers have changed i.e. from British rulers to Indian rulers but their policies are almost same.

Moreover India is still grappling with same problems which it inherited from the British like Kashmir problem, Hindu Muslim divide and communal riots etc.. In fact today India has got more problems than it had just before 1947. For example there were no sign and existence of problems like :

Terrorism
Inflation / High Cost of Living (energy, food, housing etc.)
Competition (everybody seems interested in overtaking another one which creates rivalry, egoism, tension ..)
Traffic problems in every city
Corruption (bribery, favouritism etc.)
Debt (internal and external)
Tension (of work, competition )
International Problems (USA pressure for freeing its economy, Pakistan’s mischiefs in Kashmir ….)
Loss of Faith of People (People have no faith, trust and respect in the Government and its leaders )

The real independence comes when people have lot of respect for its leaders and their Government which is not visible at all today.

Religion – The Ultimate Separatist

August 13th, 2008 | Vinod Kad

A close look at the history of humanity clearly reveals that Religion has had been the single most important factor in dividing humanity.
 
So many riots, violence, terrorist activities and even wars have had been caused solely by this dividing factor – religion. For example the Partition of India in 1947, Formation of Islamic Terror Groups, Militancy in Kashmir and other parts of the world, The Israel & Palestinian conflict, Terrorist attacks in US, UK etc. and counter attacks in Iraq, Afghanistan etc.etc.

The reason for all these is that despite the tall promises of secular form of governance said to be adopted by all the politicians in the world, the sad fact is that all the politicians, rulers have had never been able to ignore religion at all.

The single most convincing evidence about their false secular governance is the requirement of mentioning one’s religion in so many Application Forms, Declarations etc. while corresponding, communicating with various Govt and institutions, corporations, organizations etc..

The other fact which proves non-secular form of governance especially in India is the Reservation Systems for jobs. The reservation system in India is solely based on caste, creed and religion. India is by no means a secular country because it has no uniform land of law for its citizens, because it categorise people on the basis of caste, creed and religion in its census, in its job reservation systems etc. etc.

With so much violence happening in the name of religion, it is surprising that politicians still claim that they have developed their countries a lot. The fact is that unless and untill people can not understand the uselessness and futility of fighting in the name of religion, it is foolish to call ourselves ‘developed’ or ‘civilized’ by any standard at all. 

The Solution : Unless and until the politicians and their governments completely stop and rather prohibit mentioning or using of one’s religion in any communication, application or any document, this religion-based division of humanity will continue in this world especially in non-secular country like India.

Loan Waiver – Some Questions

August 11th, 2008 | Vinod Kad

The Government of India is said to have waived off debts, loans of about Rs.70,000 crores to various farmers in the country.

There are many questions on this populist idea but there is one single question which is very much disturbing. The Finance Minister P. Chidambaram told the Lok Sabha on 21/22 July that about 4 crore farmers have been benefited by this loan waiver.

Does it mean or is it ever possible that on average one single farmer owed Rs.17,500 crore worth loans to the Govt ?

If there was a mistake by Mr Chidambaram then what is the average loan amount per farmer which the Government has waived off ?

Presuming (on a very higher side) each farmer, on average owed Rs.1000 crore, does it mean or is it possible that there are 70 crore farmers in India ?

There seems something very very wrong in the figures circulated or published by the Govt.

Will somebody from Govt of India or any other person tell where this Rs.70,000 crore have been spent, I mean how many farmers were benefitted and what was the average amount per farmer waived off ?

Mohammed Rafi – A Complete Man

August 11th, 2008 | Vinod Kad


Of all the wonderful singers India has produced the name of Mohammed Rafi stands apart for various reasons. But the single most distinguishing factor is his dedication to every song he sang.
 

When you listen him you feel that he is totally absorbed in his singing. He puts in his 100% attention, commitment and energy in his song. He was such a ‘complete singer’. That’s why he could sing songs of every mood and situation possible in one’s life. And in each of his songs he seems so much absorbed, sunk and present that he leaves nothing behind while singing his songs.
 

His this ‘total’ or ‘complete’ devotion is what has made him and his songs immortal. That’s the message of all the saints, sages, gurus and experts – Put your 100% energy, attention and devotion in whatever you do – .
 

I often take inspiration from Rafi’s songs to make my every act as complete as possible. Every student of music and meditation or someone striving for excellence in his profession can learn a lot from his singing because when you listen a ‘complete man’ you are also encouraged to become ‘complete’ in whatever profession you are.

 

For Rafi, singing was a method of worshipping or reaching to his God, it was his gift to the people, it was his offering to God.

 

It is said that unless a person finds something eternal, immortal in himself and worth giving to others he is not complete. In this regard I feel Mohammed Rafi was a ‘ complete man’ as he redeemed himself by giving back his eternal, immortal voice to this world.

Democracy in India

August 11th, 2008 | Vinod Kad

I am of the firm opinion that the idea of Democratic form of governance is a failed one, atleast in countries like India. Following are the reasons :

- It is presumed that people are intelligent enough to elect ‘the best person’ available in their constituency. The fact is that most of the MPs or MLAs who win the elections are not ‘the best person’ by any standard.

- There is no qualification required to become an MLA or MP except the contestant needs to be a good orator or just a popular person (e.g. an actor, a player etc.)

- To be a King, Ruler or Head of a State one needs to work very very hard and needs to have some really great qualities like courage, committment etc.. The single most quality required is that the Head of State should not be afraid of any person in the world otherwise his decisions will be biased.

- The MPs or MLAs elected are very much afraid of taking any tough decision because they are afraid of losing their seat in next election

- There is no rule which makes voting compulsory for every eligible voter. Elections or voting are a non-serious matter for most of the voters in India. In fact most of the educated people do not vote and enjoy the voting day as holiday. And whoever votes are mostly rural people who are, ofcourse not intelligent enough to elect ‘the best person’ in their constituency.

- The rule of having a majority in the Lok Sabha is also wrong. It only allows small parties or individual MPs to exploit this rule (the recent Trust Vote on 22 July 2008 is the single most convincible proof).

- While it is difficult to expect from people to elect even one ‘best person’ in the country, it is almost impossible and rather too much to expect people to elect 543 ‘the best’ persons in the country. Therefore there is a need to atleast let people only elect 1 ‘best person’ from each state and then those 25 or 30 persons should elect one person as their ‘Head of State’ or Prime Minister.

Will somebody raise this issue in a public domain like TV, Newspapers, Parliament etc. to atleast start a debate on it ?